Kinetic description of deactivation of a supplied nickel catalyst by sodium sulphide

Capa

Citar

Texto integral

Acesso aberto Acesso aberto
Acesso é fechado Acesso está concedido
Acesso é fechado Somente assinantes

Resumo

The kinetics of reactions of liquid-phase hydrogenation of sodium acrylate on catalysts has been studied. Ni/SiO2 with different amounts of deposited nickel were used as a catalyst, as well as samples with controlled partial deactivation of the surface by sulfide ion. Approaches to determining the amount of reduced metal on the catalyst surface and the amount of catalytic poison required to deactivate active centers are shown. Hydrogenation reaction rates and activity were measured. Kinetics were modeled, and rate constants of hydrogenation, adsorption, and desorption of hydrogen were obtained. The number of active centers and their ratio to metal atoms located on the catalyst surface were estimated.

Sobre autores

Yu. Romanenko

Ivanovo State University of Chemistry and Technology

Autor responsável pela correspondência
Email: Romanenko@isuct.ru
Rússia, Ivanovo, 153000

A. Afineevskii

Ivanovo State University of Chemistry and Technology

Email: Romanenko@isuct.ru
Rússia, Ivanovo, 153000

D. Prozorov

Ivanovo State University of Chemistry and Technology

Email: Romanenko@isuct.ru
Rússia, Ivanovo, 153000

N. Gordina

Ivanovo State University of Chemistry and Technology

Email: Romanenko@isuct.ru
Rússia, Ivanovo, 153000

Bibliografia

  1. Afineevskii A.V., Prozorov D.A., Knyazev A.V., Osadchaya T.Y. // ChemistrySelect. 2020. V. 5. № 3. P. 1007. doi: 10.1002/slct.201903608
  2. Singh U.K., Vannice M.A. // Appl. Catal. A: Gen. 2001. V. 213. № 1. P. 1. doi: 10.1016/S0926-860X(00)00885-1
  3. Herron J.A., Tonelli S., Mavrikakis M. // Surf. Sci. 2012. V. 606. № 21–22. P. 1670. doi: 10.1016/j.susc.2012.07.003
  4. Ceyer S.T. // Acc. Chem. Res. 2001. V. 34. № 9. P. 737. doi: 10.1021/ar970030f
  5. Прозоров Д.А., Лукин М.В., Улитин М.В. // Изв. вузов. Химия и хим. технология. 2010. Т. 53. Вып. 2. С. 125.
  6. Li J., Liu G., Long X., Gao G., Wu J., Li F. // J. Catal. 2017. V. 355. P. 53. doi: 10.1016/j.jcat.2017.09.007
  7. Teschner D., Révay Z., Borsodi J., Hävecker M., Knop‐Gericke A., Schlögl R., Milroy D., Jackson S.D., Torres D., Sautet P. // Angew. Chem. 2008. V. 120. № 48. P. 9414. doi: 10.1002/ange.200802134
  8. Afineevskii A.V., Prozorov D.A., Osadchaya T.Y., Gordina N.E. // Fine Chem. Technol. 2023. V. 18. № 4. P. 341. doi: 10.32362/2410-6593-2023-18-4-341-354
  9. Патент РФ 2604093 C1, 2016.
  10. Bartholomew C.H. // Appl. Catal. A: Gen. 2001. V. 212. № 1–2. P. 17. doi: 10.1016/S0926-860X(00)00843-7
  11. Knapik A., Drelinkiewicz A., Szaleniec M., Makowski W., Waksmundzka-Góra A., Bukowska A., Bukowski W., Noworól J. // J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem. 2008. V. 279. № 1. P. 47. doi: 10.1016/j.molcata.2007.09.018
  12. Etayo P., Vidal-Ferran A. // Chem. Soc. Rev. 2013. V. 42. № 2. P. 728. doi: 10.1039/C2CS35410A
  13. Boudjahem A.G., Monteverdi S., Mercy M., Ghanbaja D., Bettahar M.M. // Catal. Lett. 2002. V. 84. P. 115. doi: 10.1023/A:1021093005287
  14. Vogt C., Weckhuysen B.M. / /Nature Rev. Chem. 2022. V. 6. № 2. P. 89. doi: 10.1038/s41570-021-00340-y
  15. Samokhvalov A., Tatarchuk B.J. // Catal. Rev. 2010. V. 52. № 3. P. 381. doi: 10.1080/01614940.2010.498749
  16. Nørskov J.K., Bligaard T., Hvolbæk B., Abild-Pedersen F., Chorkendorff I., Christensen C.H. // Chem. Soc. Rev. 2008. V. 37. № 10. P. 2163. doi: 10.1039/b800260f
  17. Сухачев Я.П., Прозоров Д.А., Афинеевский А.В., Челышева М.Д., Никитин К.А., Жилин М.А. // Вестник Тверского государственного университета. Серия: Химия. 2018. № 3. С. 89.
  18. Меркин А.А., Романенко Ю.Е., Лефедова О.В. // Известия высших учебных заведений. Химия и химическая технология. 2014. Т. 57. № 8. С. 93. doi: 10.7868/S0044453714080263

Arquivos suplementares

Arquivos suplementares
Ação
1. JATS XML
Baixar