Acta Universitatis Dentistriae et Chirurgiae MaxillofacialisActa Universitatis Dentistriae et Chirurgiae MaxillofacialisActa Universitatis Dentistriae et Chirurgiae MaxillofacialisActa Universitatis Dentistriae et Chirurgiae MaxillofacialisУниверситетская стоматология и челюстно-лицевая хирургияActa Universitatis Dentistriae et Chirurgiae Maxillofacialis3034-297XEco-Vector62941210.17816/uds629412Publications of young scientistsПубликации молодых ученыхResearch ArticleClinical experience of using Vary-Simplex Discipline Alexander .018''Клинический опыт применения механики Vary-Simplex Discipline Alexander .018''https://orcid.org/0009-0002-5018-3960DmitrienkoAnna E.ДмитриенкоАнна Евгеньевна
Russian Federation

intern

ординатор

anna.e.dmitrienko@gmail.comhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-4501-21664585-8331LaninaAnastasia N.ЛанинаАнастасия Николаевна
Russian Federation

Cand. Sci. (Med.), Associate Professor

канд. мед. наук, доцент

sadis57@mail.ruNorth-Western State Medical University named after I.I. MechnikovСеверо-Западный государственный медицинский университет им. И.И. Мечникова100620242143472503202418042024Copyright ©; 2024, Eco-VectorCopyright ©; 2024, Эко-вектор2024Eco-VectorЭко-векторhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0https://stomuniver.ru/unistom/article/view/629412

The study presents the design features of braces, the mechanics of treatment using Vari-Simplex Discipline Alexander .018'', and the main changes in the treatment methodology that have occurred from the introduction of the system to the present. Bracket slots .018'' and .022'' were compared based on clinical experience.

Представлены конструктивные особенности брекетов и механики лечения Vari-Simplex Discipline Alexander .018'', а также основные изменения в методике лечения с момента появления системы до настоящего времени. Выполнено сравнение .018'' и .022'' паза брекетов на основании клинического опыта.

Alexander bracesslot .018''Vari-Simplex Disciplinedistance between bracesrotation controlsingle bracestorque controlбрекеты Alexander.018'' пазVari-Simplex Disciplineмежбрекетное расстояниеротационный контрольодиночные брекетыконтроль торкаBennett JK. Principles of orthodontic bracket selection. Lviv: GalDent, 2012. 116 p. (In Russ.)Беннетт Дж.К. Принципы выбора ортодонтических брекетов. Львов: ГалДент, 2012. 116 с.Nanda R. Biomechanics and aesthetics in clinical orthodontics. Moscow: MEDpress-Inform, 2016. 388 p. (In Russ.)Нанда Р. Биомеханика и эстетика в клинической ортодонтии. Москва: МЕДпресс-информ, 2016. 388 с.Proffit W, Fields R, Henry WJr. Contemporary orthodontics. Mosby, 2006. 768 p.Proffit W., Fields R., Henry W.Jr. Contemporary orthodontics. Mosby, 2006. 768 p.Rakosi T, Graber TM. Dental-alveolar and maxillofacial orthodontic treatment. Transl. from. eng. Lviv: GalDent, 2012. 398 p. (In Russ.)Ракоши Т., Грабер Т.М. Зубоальвеолярное и челюстно-лицевое ортодонтическое лечение / пер. с англ. Львов: ГалДент, 2012. 398 с.Alexander RG. Modern concept and philosophy of orthodontics. Transl. Gerasimov SN. 1997. 312 p. (In Russ.)Александр Р.Г. Современная концепция и философия ортодонтии / пер. С.Н. Герасимова. 1997. 312 с.Porto OCL, Silva BSF, Silva JA, et al. CBCT assessment of bone thickness in maxillary and mandibular teeth: ananatomic study. J Appl Oral Sci. 2020;28: e20190148. doi: 10.1590/1678-7757-2019-0148Porto O.C.L., Silva B.S.F., Silva J.A., et al. CBCT assessment of bone thickness in maxillary and mandibular teeth: ananatomic study // J Appl Oral Sci. 2020. Vol. 28. ID e20190148. doi: 10.1590/1678-7757-2019-0148Akbulut S, Bayrak S. Evaluation´ of mandibular alveolar bone in patients withdifferent vertical facial patterns: A cross-sectional CBCT study. J Orofac Orthop. 2022;85:89–97. doi: 10.1007/s00056-022-00408-4Akbulut S., Bayrak S. Evaluation´ of mandibular alveolar bone in patients withdifferent vertical facial patterns: A cross-sectional CBCT study // J Orofac Orthop. 2022. Vol. 85. P. 89–97. doi: 10.1007/s00056-022-00408-4Casanova-Sarmiento JA, Arriola-Guillén LE, Ruíz-Mora GA, et al. Comparison of anterior mandibular alveolar thicknessand height in young adults with different sagittal and vertical skeletalrelationships: A CBCT Study. Int Orthod. 2020;18(1):79–88. doi: 10.1016/j.ortho.2019.10.001Casanova-Sarmiento J.A., Arriola-Guillén L.E., Ruíz-Mora G.A., et al. Comparison of anterior mandibular alveolar thicknessand height in young adults with different sagittal and vertical skeletalrelationships: A CBCT Study // Int Orthod. 2020. Vol. 18, N1. P. 79–88. doi: 10.1016/j.ortho.2019.10.001Chen H, Liu Z, Hu X, et al. Comparison of mandibular cross-sectionalmorphology between Class I and Class II subjects with different verticalpatterns: based on CBCT images and statistical shape analysis. BMC Oral Health. 2021;21(1):238. doi: 10.1186/s12903-021-01591-3Chen H., Liu Z., Hu X., et al. Comparison of mandibular cross-sectionalmorphology between Class I and Class II subjects with different verticalpatterns: based on CBCT images and statistical shape analysis // BMC Oral Health. 2021. Vol. 21, N. 1. ID 238. doi: 10.1186/s12903-021-01591-3Alhawasli RY, Ajaj MA, Hajeer MY, et al. volumetricanalysis of the jaws in skeletal class I and III patients with different facial divergence using CBCT Imaging. Radiol Res Pract. 2022;2022:2416555. doi: 10.1155/2022/2416555Alhawasli R.Y., Ajaj M.A., Hajeer M.Y., et al. volumetricanalysis of the jaws in skeletal class I and III patients with different facial divergence using CBCT Imaging // Radiol Res Pract. 2022. Vol. 2022. ID 2416555. doi: 10.1155/2022/2416555